Banned from Tradeloop

Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop

Ethics Committee voted to keep Respondent's BAN in place.

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop

Defendant was banned, then requested to be reinstated. Ethics Committee Voted to keep the BAN against the defendant in place for three more years from April 2013.

Complaint against non-member who was previously BANNED for Ethics. Committee voted to BAN the defendant and Broadcast the blog to the community.

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Collections issue.

Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Voting closed. Ban and Broadcast. Closing case.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the Respondent from Tradeloop

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the Respondent from Tradeloop

Defendant failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the Respondent from Tradeloop

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop.

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Banned for not responding.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop.

Non-Member Respondent BANNED for failure to respond within seven days. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant and broadcast the case to the community.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant and broadcast the case to the community.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant and broadcast the case to the community.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant and broadcast the case to the community.

Ethics Committee voted to Ban the defendant from Tradeloop.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop.

Defendant failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop.

Defendant failed to respond within allowed time and was Banned for non-response. 

Non-member case elected to be heard by the Ethics Committee. Committee voted BAN the defendant from Tradeloop.

Non-member case elected to be heard by the Ethics Committee. Committee voted BAN the defendant from Tradeloop.

Defendant failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response. 

Globe Liquidators applied for Tradeloop Membership but is the same company as iPodSultan.  Case was filed against iPodSultan.   Committee voted to BAN defendant (applicant) from Tradeloop.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop. 

Non-Member case heard by Committee. Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant and broadcast the case to the Tradeloop community

Non-member case heard and voted on by committee. Non-member BANNED per committee decision. 

Vote resulted in Non-Member Defendant being BANNED from Tradeloop.

Member defendant Banned from Tradeloop by Ethics Committee vote. 

Member defendant Banned per Ethics Committee vote. 

Member defendant failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response. 

Non-Member case that was elected to be heard by Ethics Committee. Non-Member defendant BANNED from Tradeloop. 

 Member defendant BANNED from Tradeloop.

Non-Member case that was elected to be heard by Ethics Committee. Non-Member defendant BANNED from Tradeloop

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the member defendant and Broadcast this case to the community.

Committee voted to BAN defendant (applicant) from Tradeloop.

Member defendant failed to respond within seven days and has been banned.

Voting resulted in Defendant (Membership Applicant) being BANNED from Tradeloop site Note he was involved in two cases at once with two companies, both were banned. See multiple complaints here

Case appears to have been mediated however had already gone to vote. Committee voted to Ban and Broadcast the case.

Non-Member case heard by Committee. Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant.

Committee voted to BAN and BROADCAST.

Multiple Complaints. Defendant posted "I am not affiliated with Martin Collins" while logged in as Martin Collins. See the blog.

Non-Member case that was elected to be heard by Ethics Committee. Non-Member defendant BANNED from Tradeloop Multiple Complaints. Defendant posted "I am not affiliated with Martin Collins" while logged in as Martin Collins. See the blog.

Multiple Complaints. Defendant posted "I am not affiliated with Martin Collins" while logged in as Martin Collins. See the blog.

See links to other related cases in comments. Mulitple Complaints.

Vote resulted in BAN of NON-MEMBER defendant

Tradeloop Member BANNED for non response. Tradeloop is categorizing this case as COUNTERFEITING not COLLECTIONS because it was revealed to Tradeloop's that the goods sold by FULI to A3NET were not paid for because they were seized by the Department of Homeland Security as counterfeit. Also it was alleged that physical threats were being made.

Vote resulted in No Action but posting as FYI due to Multiple complaints against this individual.

Vote resulted in Member Defendant being BANNED from Tradeloop. Notice sent to community 3/19/2012

Member Defendant BANNED as a result of vote

Voting resulted in Defendant (Membership Applicant) being BANNED from Tradeloop site Note he was involved in two cases at once with two companies, both were banned. See multiple complaints here

Vote resulted in Member Defendant Werewind being bannedand the case blog being broadcasted to the community.

Member defendant BANNED for failure to respond to case within allowed time.

Voting resulted in Member Defendant being BANNED

Vote concluded that Member defendant is BANNED from Tradeloop

Voting resulted in Member defendant being BANNED

Voting resulted in Member defendant being BANNED

Voting resulted in Member defendant being BANNED

Member defendant failed to respond within 7 days, he has been BANNED

Voting resulted in Member defendant being BANNED

Voted to BAN and BROADCAST. Multiple complaints.

Vote resulted in BAN of MEMBER defendant

Voting is now closed. Vote ended in result of Member being BANNED.

Voting is now closed. Vote ended in Posted Violation / BANNED.  Multiple Violations

Due to multiple reports the committee decided to BAN the Member defendant and broadcast the caseto the community.

Vote result was to Ban Member defendant and broadcast the case blog. Notification sent to the community on 3/5/2010

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant, Notice being sent to community on Monday November 9th, 2009.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant, Notice being sent to community on Monday November 9th, 2009.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant, Notice being sent to community on Monday November 9th, 2009.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant. Notice will be sent to the community in twenty four hours.

Banned for non response. Also the Defendant was banned from Tradeloop for not paying the bill.

Voting closed. Ban and Broadcast. Closing case. Sent notice to community.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN, POST, and BROADCAST the case.

Ethics Committee voted to POST and Broadcast the case to the Tradeloop community.

The majority of the Ethics Committee voted to post this case to the Tradeloop Membership and Ban the defendant from Tradeloop. This is the first of two cases, the other case is case 4983.

Two separate cases against complainant. Other case is case 4677 Majority of committee voted to ban defendant.

Committee voted to BAN the defendant and BROADCAST the case to the community.

Case is being closed due to: no follow up by non-member complainant, defendant has disappeared and is already blocked from Tradeloop, multiple complaints 

After reviewing the case, the committee decided to BAN the defendant and POST the case to the community. Note the defendant is not a Tradeloop member, however if they apply they will be denied access.

Banned for non response

The committee has decided to ban the defendant and post the blog to the Tradeloop Membership.

Committee voted to broadcast the complaint and ban the defendant.

Defendant banned from Tradeloop due to not responding to the ethics complaint.

Defendant has been banned for not participating in the ethics process.

Ethics committee voted to ban Computek from Tradeloop.

Defendant banned from Tradeloop due to non response to complaint.

Originally no action taken due to lack of follow up, but defendant has other posted violations so posting as an FYI.

Ethics Committee took no action. The defendant had already been banned from Tradeloop.

Due to non-response, Triton Communications has been banned from Tradeloop.

Status: The Ethics Committee voted to post the complaint and ban Mingsida from Tradeloop.

Defendant banned from Tradeloop due to failure to respond. NOTE Multiple complaints.

We did not receive a response from HRC. Inc. They cancelled their account on 10/29/05 and since then the phone number has been disconnected and the email account is hard bouncing. The defendant has been banned due to non response. This neither confirms nor denies the facts of the case.

The Tradeloop Ethics committee voted to BAN the defendant.

Computer Spare Parts (PMITEX) has been banned from Tradeloop for not responding to an ethics complaint.