Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Committee not hearing case due to slow/no response from complainant

Non-Member Respondent BANNED for failure to respond within seven days. 

Non-Member Respondent BANNED for failure to respond within seven days. 

Non-Member Respondent BANNED for failure to respond within seven days. Defendant was not found on Tradeloop.

Non-Member Respondent BANNED for failure to respond within seven days. Defendant was not found on Tradeloop.

In discussion between parties. Non-Member Case. 

Non-Member Respondent BANNED for failure to respond within seven days, and for three complaints against them.

Non-Member Respondent BANNED for failure to respond within seven days, and for three complaints against them.

Non-Member Respondent BANNED for failure to respond within seven days.

Respondent NOT on Tradeloop. BANNED for failure to respond within seven days.

Non-Member Respondent Banned for failure to respond within seven days. 

Non-Member Respondent banned for failure to respond within seven days.

Non-Member Respondent banned for failure to respond within seven days.  

Respondent NOT on Tradeloop. Non-Member Respondentbanned for failure to respond within seven days.

Respondent NOT on Tradeloop. Non-Member Respondent banned for failure to respond within seven days.

Non-Member Respondent banned for failure to respond within seven days.

Non-Member Respondent banned for failure to respond within seven days.

Non-Member Respondent banned for failure to respond within seven days.

Non-Member Respondent banned for failure to respond within seven days.

Open discussion between defendant and complainant. Non-member defendant. 

In discussion between parties. Defendant NOT FOUND on Tradeloop. 

Non-member defendant banned for failure to respond within seven days.

Defendant NOT FOUND on Tradeloop. Non-member defendant banned for failure to respond within seven days.

Complaint against non-member, waiting on them to respond. 

Non-member defendant banned for failure to respond within seven days.

Complaint against non-member. No case stage process is applied to non-member complaints.

Non-member defendant previously banned for non-payment. Now BANNED for failing to respond to Ethics complaint as well.

Complaint against non-member. No case stage process is applied to non-member complaints.

Non-member defendant banned for failure to respond within seven days.   

Non-member defendant banned for failure to respond within seven days. 

Non-member defendant Banned for failure to respond within seven days. 

Non-member complaint. Defendant banned for failing to respond within seven  days. 

Non-member defendant has been  Banned  from Tradeloop for failure to respond within the seven day response window.

Non-member defendant has been  Banned  from Tradeloop for failure to respond within the seven day response window.

Case is two non-members disputing one hard drive.  Committee decided too small to hear.

Non-member defendant failed to respond in seven days and has been BANNED from Tradeloop for non-response. 

Non-member defendant has been banned from Tradeloop for failure to respond within the seven day response window.

Committee discussed but refused to hear the case

Dispute over condition and testing.   Complainant asserts he ordered tested working, Defendant asserts they were untested pulls.  Committee declined to hear this non-member case.  

Non-member defendant  banned  for failure to respond.

Application rejected due to two flags

Non-member defendant BANNED for failure to respond.  

Non-member defendant BANNED for failure to respond. 

This most recent complaint is: Paid $5,700 for server equipment, products never shipped.

New complaint against a previously banned member.

Case initially heard but then moved to non-member due to non-response from complainant/defendant.

FYI : This person has THREE companies marked OUT OF BUSINESS on Tradeloop. Posting to Non-Member complaints as a warning.

FYI : This person has THREE companies marked OUT OF BUSINESS on Tradeloop. Posting to Non-Member complaints as a warning.

NOT FOUND on Tradeloop. Did not respond to complaint.

Banned due to non-response.

No response from defendant, banned.

Banned for no response.

No response, already banned for a different case.

Defending NOT on Tradeloop. Did not respond.

Defendant requested case removal but committee refused to hear case. Note: Tradeloop has identified discrepancies in account ownership/validation.

 

Multiple identities? Also see Case 5155: Sent a gaylord of scrap hard drives at a quoted price per pound. Not paid! Committee did not pick up this case to hear.

Banned for no response to case.

Multiple identities? Also see Case 5154: Has not paid for Material! All known accounts blocked pending further validation. Committee did not pick up this case to hear.

The defendant was NOT on Tradeloop. He attempted to register in Nov 2012 but failed basic validation. His IP address resolved to Nigeria. He is sending forged Broadcasts on his own.

Banned for non-response.

Complainant made case and tried to retract it within an hour. Leaving posted due to multiple violations, until Committee approves removal.

Due to defendant having more than one posted case, this case will remain visible until Committee approves removal.

Non-member complaint. Failed to respond. Banned for non-response

Banned for non-response.

Banned for non-response.

Banned for non response. Non-member.

Banned for non-response.

Committee had a long discussion and finds validity in the accusation but refuses to hear the case. Defendant had already been removed from Membership so this new complaint stays as a non-member case.

Due to non-response banned.

NOT ON TRADELOOP. Did not respond to case. Banned

non member no response BANNED>

Banned due to no response.

Banned for non-response. But already banned for bad dent to Tradeloop of $99.

Banned due to non-response.

Defendant banned, multiple complaints against Justin Vanley

No response from defendant. Banned.

Banned for failure to respond.

Banned for non response.

Discussion about known fraudulent accounts found on LinkedIN that continue to commit fraud without being removed.

No response from defendant, banned from Tradeloop.

Mulitple Complaints.  No response. Defendant previously banned with a Posted Violation.

Banned for non-response, and account merged with account of previously banned company. They are the same.

Mulitple complaints. And no response. Banned.

Committee discussed case but did not pick it up or come to any conclusion. Remains visible as a non-member case.

Committee declined to hear the case.

Non-member, banned for no response. But already banned for NON-PAYMENT.

Failed to follow through on PO. Failed to refund deposit. Failed attempt to falsify identity. Failed to respond to case. Fail. BANNED

Multiple complaints against this individual. Possible DBA "Computers 4 a Cure" . Banned.

Banned for non response

Failed Tradeloop validation. Not a member. Did not respond. Banned.

Multiple complaints against this individual.

ASCDI Complaint. Non-member with two prior flags. FYI only.

Asked Committees if anyone knew the dealer that was in question.

User previously blocked on Tradeloop for failed validations and two other complaints.

User reporting validation issue. Account already blocked.

No response from non-member. Banned.

Non-Member Case. No response. Banned.

Anonymous complaint. Lack of interest by Committee

Non-Member case no response already blocked failed validation BANNED

Non member no response BANNED

Non-member, banned, no response, multiple complaints.

Committee commented but did not pick up the case. Remains a non-member case.

Non-response from defendant. Previously Banned with a Posted Violation. Note he was involved in two cases at once with two companies, both were banned. See multiple complaints here

Multiple complaints against this individual. Banned.

Already banned. multiple complaints against Justin Vanley

Banned for non response, Non member. Also see multiple complaints against Justin Vanley

Non-Member case, did not respond. Banned.

Non Member case No response. Banned.

multiple complaints against Justin Vanley Already banned.

No response from non-member. Banned.

Banned for non-response.

No response from defendant. Banned.

Non-Member Case. No reply. Banned from Tradeloop.

Defendant NOT ON TRADELOOP & No response. Banned.

NOT on Tradeloop. No response. Banned.

Defendant NOT on Tradeloop. Account created for this case. Did not respond. Banned. See multiple cases against them.

Multiple experts claim this company exhibits signs of counterfeiting. Committee did not pick up the case. Access denied by Tradeloop.

Due to lack of supporting evidence Committee refuses to hear the case.

Non-member case. NO response. Posted case, marked as "Out of Business".

Non member banned for non response.

Notifying Membership Committee of multiple registrations from a non-member.

Defendant NOT on Tradeloop. Account created for this case. Did not respond. Banned. See multiple cases against them.

Claim is against a previously BANNED company, who is now a NON-MEMBER

non response from Defendant BANNED non member

Non-member, no response to case, never passed account validation anyways, BANNED

Moved to Non-Member case as issue involves two Non-Members. No response. BANNED.

Membership Committee denied membership application

Tradeloop received a flag against a NON-MEMBER, case has been moved to Non-Member cases and sent out to the community.

Not Tradeloop members. No Response. Banning.

Non-Member case, no response. BANNED.

Non-Member defendant BANNED for choosing not to respond to case.

Non members. No response, post, ban.

CASE REFUSED: Defendant is already barred from Tradeloop.  Non Member case

Non-Member defendant BANNED for failing to respond in time allowed.

Non-Member defendant defendant BANNED due to failure to reply to case against them within seven day time frame allotted.

A Member pointed out a Broadcast offering counterfeit goods. The manufacturer subsequently confirmed it. The committee discussed and the user was denied access.

Voting resulted in case blog being BROADCASTED to the community.

Vote resulted in BAN of NON-MEMBER defendant

Voting has concluded. Vote to BAN Non-Member defendant and broadcast the case to the community.

Member already BANNED due to non-payment. Now BANNED as a non-member for failure to respond to ethics case.

Case closed as no action taken.

FYI : This person has THREE companies marked OUT OF BUSINESS on Tradeloop. Posting to Non-Member complaints as a warning.

BANNED - (Non-Member) defendant due to failure to respond within seven day deadline. Notice going out on 10/9

No response from Defendant, BANNING defendant and posting case.

Respondent not on Tradeloop: Peter Chidi Ngodo Gadgets4u (GB) Limited 37 Hadleigh RD., Ipswich Suffolk,IP2 0EP United Kingdom 44 (0) 871 572 8212
sales@dg4u.biz

Non member banned for non-response

Non-member Defendant failed to respond to the case.

Non-member defendant did not respond

Non-member defendant failed to respond.

Non member defendant did not respond to three warnings and a phone call. Posted case.

Committee voted to POST the case and BAN the non-member defendant.

Non-member defendant non-response. Posting case.

Case mediated. Complainant has not removed complaint.

Defendant/Complainant stopped responding.

Case seems to have been mediated. Complainant has not removed the case however.

Tradeloop has an unethical competitor called Traders Broadcast Network, who is stealing our Broadcast and sending them to their own membership. This is a membership issue as well because we've received several complaints of fraud on TBN lists, coming in response to Tradeloop Broadcasts.

GST has been blocked from Tradeloop because their credit card declined and we were unable to contact them. ASCDI recently sent out a notice about GST, see below.

Closing case due to lack of follow up by complainant. Tradeloop does not pursue straight collections issues, especially when the defendant appears to have gone out of business.

No further follow up from complainant, no supporting evidence supplied.

Complainant topped pursuing case. Resolved?

Defendant provided tracking numbers showing payment. Complainant stopped responding. Committee not hearing the case.

Frivolous case. Complainant decided not to pursue. Case Closed.

Collections issue. Not an ethics case.

After numerous communications with buyer and seller, case was mediated.

Issued Fast Track Fraud alert.

ASCDI already found a violation, Committee does not want to hear the case.

Non-member defendant has been banned for not participating in the ethics process.

Appears case was mediated. No further response from complainant.

Committee declines to hear case without supporting documentation.

Committee declined to intervene in this case. Case closed.

Case closed. Complainant stopped responding and never moved forward with the case. Funds possibly tied up in Paypal.

Committee did not hear case. Complainant did not follow through with documentation.

Case not heard. Neither party responded & complainant failed to provide documentation.

Network Computer Trading was already banned from Tradeloop. Now they are double banished. In this case it's for refusing to respond to the complaint. The facts of this case were neither confirmed nor denied.

Case closed. Defendant didn't respond.