Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Committee voted to Broadcast the case blog to the community, so members can form their own opinion. 

Impersonation Alert Sent to the Community

Committee voted to Broadcast the case blog to the community, so they could form their own opinion. 

Impersonation Alert Sent to the Community

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop

Ethics Committee voted to keep Respondent's BAN in place.

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop

Committee voted to Broadcast the case blog to the community, so they could form their own opinion. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop

Defendant was banned, then requested to be reinstated. Ethics Committee Voted to keep the BAN against the defendant in place for three more years from April 2013.

Complaint against non-member who was previously BANNED for Ethics. Committee voted to BAN the defendant and Broadcast the blog to the community.

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate company attempting to collect wire payments. 

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Person posing as E&M Communications - Fraud Alert sent to community

Person posing as Southwest Tel-Supply - Fraud Alert sent to community

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Person posing as NetworkEquipment.net - Fraud Alert sent to community. 

Person posing as Billie Combs of IT Supply Solutions. Fraud Alert sent to community. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop

Someone using two fake emails, fake phone, and fake fax number to try and sell products to people pretending to be Alex of MK Trading. 

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Collections issue.

Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Committee voted to Broadcast the case blog to the community, so they could form their own opinion. 

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response

Voting closed. Ban and Broadcast. Closing case.

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate company attempting to source products on net terms. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop

Committee voted to Broadcast the case blog to the community, so they could form their own opinion. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the Respondent from Tradeloop

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the Respondent from Tradeloop

Defendant failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Committee voted to Broadcast the case blog to the community, so they could form their own opinion. 

Industry wide alert sent out about someone potentially posing as another person. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the Respondent from Tradeloop

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN respondent from Tradeloop.

Industry wide alert sent out about someone potentially posing as another person. 

Non-Member Respondent failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Banned for not responding.

Industry wide alert sent out about someone potentially posing as another person. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop.

Non-Member Respondent BANNED for failure to respond within seven days. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant and broadcast the case to the community.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant and broadcast the case to the community.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant and broadcast the case to the community.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant and broadcast the case to the community.

Industry wide alert sent out about someone potentially posing as another person. 

Industry wide alert sent out to the community. 

Ethics Committee voted to Ban the defendant from Tradeloop.

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate company

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate entity.

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate entity.

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate company

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate company

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate company

Ethics Committee voted to Broadcast this case to the community. Read a summary of the Committtee decision here: Ethics Post 6120-11388 (if case is already open click here)  

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop.

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate entity. 

Defendant failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop.

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate entity. 

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate company

Fraud alert received, defendant notified, posted as fraud alert per Committee request.  

Defendant failed to respond within allowed time and was Banned for non-response. 

Non-member case elected to be heard by the Ethics Committee. Committee voted BAN the defendant from Tradeloop.

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate company. 

Industry wide alert sent out about someone posing as a legitimate company. 

Non-member case elected to be heard by the Ethics Committee. Committee voted BAN the defendant from Tradeloop.

Committee voted to Broadcast the case blog to the community, but not ban the defendant.

Defendant failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response. 

Committee voted to Broadcast the case blog to the community, but not ban the defendant.

Globe Liquidators applied for Tradeloop Membership but is the same company as iPodSultan.  Case was filed against iPodSultan.   Committee voted to BAN defendant (applicant) from Tradeloop.

Non-member case elected to be heard by the Ethics Committee. Committee voted to Broadcast the case blog to the community, but not ban the defendant. 

Defendant received two complaints in the same day. Ethics Committee requested to fast track notification to the community. 

Committee voted to Broadcast the case blog to the community, but not ban the defendant. 

Defendant NOT FOUND on Tradeloop. Non-member complaint, no Ethics case stage process applied. Fast track fraud alert per committee request. 

Alert sent to community. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop. 

Ethics Committee voted to BROADCAST the complaint, but NOT ban the defendant. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop. 

Committee voted to Broadcast this case to the community, but NOT ban the defendant. 

Ethics Committee voted to BAN defendant from Tradeloop. 

Ethics Committee voted to Broadcast the case to the community. 

Defendant NOT found on Tradeloop. Defendant has other Case: 5957

Defendant NOT found on Tradeloop. Defendant has other Case: 5932

Non-Member case heard by Committee. Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant and broadcast the case to the Tradeloop community

Ethics Committee has elected to send a Fast Track Alert. 

Non-member case heard and voted on by committee. Non-member BANNED per committee decision. 

Counter Complaint filed by Defendant: Case 5820 | Ethics Committee voted to Broadcast this case to the community, but NOT ban the defendant. 

Non-Member complaint elected to be heard by Ethics Committee | Committee voted to Broadcast this complaint to the community, but NOT ban the defendant. 

Counter Complaint of Case 5798 | Committee voted to Broadcast this complaint to the community, but NOT ban the defendant. 

Vote resulted in Non-Member Defendant being BANNED from Tradeloop.

Note: Defendant had two other cases filed against them in a short period of time and was subsequently banned in another case. 

Member defendant Banned from Tradeloop by Ethics Committee vote. 

Member defendant Banned per Ethics Committee vote. 

Ethics Committee voted to Broadcast this case to the community. 

Member defendant failed to respond within seven (7) days and was Banned for non-response. 

Non-Member case that was elected to be heard by Ethics Committee. Non-Member defendant BANNED from Tradeloop. 

 Member defendant BANNED from Tradeloop.

The committee voted to BROADCAST this case to the Tradeloop Community, but NOT ban the defendant. 

Committee requested a fast track fraud alert be sent to the Tradeloop community. 

Non-Member case that was elected to be heard by Ethics Committee. Non-Member defendant BANNED from Tradeloop

Sending fast track fraud alert to community due to multiple complaints.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the member defendant and Broadcast this case to the community.

Ethics Committee voted to BROADCAST this non-member complaint to the community, but NOT ban the defendant.

Ethics Committee voted to BROADCAST this non-member complaint to the community, but NOT ban the defendant. 

 Ethics Committee voted to BROADCAST the complaint, but NOT ban the defendant.

Sent notification to community. 

Ethics Committee voted to BROADCAST the complaint, but NOT ban the defendant.

Committee voted to BAN defendant (applicant) from Tradeloop.

Committee voted to Broadcast the case, but NOT ban the defendant.

Sent notification to community about identity theft alert.

Committee voted to Broadcast the case to the community, but NOT Ban the defendant.

Committee voted to Broadcast the case to the community, but NOT Ban the defendant.

Advisory Committee approved defendant's application for membership, case was made against non-Member. Case remains posted until removed by Ethics Committee.

This was a non-member case. After the fact the defendant applied for Membership. The case was not heard, no voting, no ban, no pictures supplied, and the complainant didn't pursue it any further after the Defendant requested membership. The Advisory Committee voted and approved defendant's application for membership, although the case remains posted.

Member defendant failed to respond within seven days and has been banned.

The committee voted to Broadcast but not ban the defendant.

 

 

Fraud alert sent to community on 11-02-2012

Voting resulted in Defendant (Membership Applicant) being BANNED from Tradeloop site Note he was involved in two cases at once with two companies, both were banned. See multiple complaints here

Case appears to have been mediated however had already gone to vote. Committee voted to Ban and Broadcast the case.

See counter-complaint at Case 5451. The committee voted to BROADCAST this case to the Tradeloop Community, but NOT ban the defendant.

Counter-complaint to Case 5450. The committee voted to BROADCAST this case to the Tradeloop Community, but NOT ban the defendant.

Non-Member case heard by Committee. Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant.

Committee voted to BAN and BROADCAST.

Sent fraud alert to the community.

Identity theft case

Non-Member case heard by Committee. Ethics Committee voted to BROADCAST the case to the Tradeloop community.

Sending fraud alert to community. Multiple vendors implicated.

Multiple Complaints. Defendant posted "I am not affiliated with Martin Collins" while logged in as Martin Collins. See the blog.

Non-Member case that was elected to be heard by Ethics Committee. Non-Member defendant BANNED from Tradeloop Multiple Complaints. Defendant posted "I am not affiliated with Martin Collins" while logged in as Martin Collins. See the blog.

Multiple Complaints. Defendant posted "I am not affiliated with Martin Collins" while logged in as Martin Collins. See the blog.

See links to other related cases in comments. Mulitple Complaints.

Already BANNED Numerous complaints. See Blog. A year later posting a fresh FRAUD ALERT.

Vote resulted in BAN of NON-MEMBER defendant

Sending notification to community

Sending notification to community.

Fraud alert sent to community.

Tradeloop Member BANNED for non response. Tradeloop is categorizing this case as COUNTERFEITING not COLLECTIONS because it was revealed to Tradeloop's that the goods sold by FULI to A3NET were not paid for because they were seized by the Department of Homeland Security as counterfeit. Also it was alleged that physical threats were being made.

Defendant has multiple complaints. This "No Action Taken" case now moved to Posted Violations.

Sending fast track fraud alert to community.

Notification going out to community.

Vote resulted in No Action but posting as FYI due to Multiple complaints against this individual.

Sending notification to community

Sending notification to the community

Vote resulted in Member Defendant being BANNED from Tradeloop. Notice sent to community 3/19/2012

Sending community notification

Building and sending notification to community.

Non-member case, blocked access for non-member

Member Defendant BANNED as a result of vote

Sending notification to community about identity theft

Voting resulted in Defendant (Membership Applicant) being BANNED from Tradeloop site Note he was involved in two cases at once with two companies, both were banned. See multiple complaints here

Sending notification to community.

Sending notification to community to be on alert

Vote resulted in Member Defendant Werewind being bannedand the case blog being broadcasted to the community.

Alerting community to issue with TBN Security

Non member, alert only. BANNED

FRAUD ALERT sent to community. SEE DETAILS BELOW

Fraud Alert sent to community

Member defendant BANNED for failure to respond to case within allowed time.

FRAUD ALERT - FYI Sent to community.

Voting resulted in Member Defendant being BANNED

Fraud notice sent to community.

Sending notification to community regarding case of identity theft.

Sending notification to community regarding Identity Theft alert.

Sending notification to community letting them know.

Vote concluded that Member defendant is BANNED from Tradeloop

Sent notice to community regarding identity theft. Legitimate company details, but a fake name and fake email address

Posted and broadcasted out to the community.

Broadcasting to the community

Voting resulted in Member defendant being BANNED

Broadcasted to community

Voting resulted in Member defendant being BANNED

Voting resulted in Member defendant being BANNED

Member defendant failed to respond within 7 days, he has been BANNED

Voting resulted in Member defendant being BANNED

Sent notice to community notifying them that someone is posing as Global IT Networks.

Info came in and is now posted in Ethics for member knowledge.

Please use caution when dealing with Zetcom, information regarding true identity of company employees is currently being investigated.

Voted to BAN and BROADCAST. Multiple complaints.

Fraud alert sent to the community on July 28th.

FRAUD ALERT notice sent to community. Ethics committee voted to broadcast a fraud alert

Person posing as Jonas Frey caused a complaint to be filed against the real company. Upon further investigation the complainant determined it was indeed a scammer posing as Probe Networks.

Vote resulted in BAN of MEMBER defendant

VOTING CLOSED - Warning issued to defendant regarding actions

Voting is now closed. Vote ended in result of Member being BANNED.

Sent Fast Track Fraud Alert to community

Voting is now closed. Vote ended in Posted Violation / BANNED.  Multiple Violations

EC requested a fraud alert.

Posting case and sending Fraud alert

Due to multiple reports the committee decided to BAN the Member defendant and broadcast the caseto the community.

Voting closed. Committee voted to BROADCAST the case to the community. Note multiple reports

Voting closed. Committee voted to broadcast the case to the community.

Vote result was to Ban Member defendant and broadcast the case blog. Notification sent to the community on 3/5/2010

Sent Fast Track Fraud Alert to the community

Sent notice to community about identity theft

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant, Notice being sent to community on Monday November 9th, 2009.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant, Notice being sent to community on Monday November 9th, 2009.

FAST TRACK FRAUD ALERT SENT OUT TO COMMUNITY

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant, Notice being sent to community on Monday November 9th, 2009.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN the defendant. Notice will be sent to the community in twenty four hours.

Committee voted to BROADCAST the case after the case was settled between the defendant and complainant.

Someone posing as EOS Bilisim

Posted Warning. The committee posted this violation so members can see the case however the defendant was not banned from Tradeloop.

Banned for non response. Also the Defendant was banned from Tradeloop for not paying the bill.

Fraud alert sent and moved to posted violations.

Voting closed. Ban and Broadcast. Closing case. Sent notice to community.

Cleaning up case information and sending to community.

Posted and fast track fraud alert sent.

After discussion the committee decided to NOT BAN the defendant but to POST AND BROADCAST the case blog, so the Tradeloop membership can form their own opinion.

Ethics Committee voted to BAN, POST, and BROADCAST the case.

Ethics Committee voted to POST and Broadcast the case to the Tradeloop community.

Posted Fraud Alert

The majority of the Ethics Committee voted to post this case to the Tradeloop Membership and Ban the defendant from Tradeloop. This is the first of two cases, the other case is case 4983.

Two separate cases against complainant. Other case is case 4677 Majority of committee voted to ban defendant.

After reviewing and discussing the case, the Ethics Committee decided to NOT BAN the defendant, however they voted to BROADCAST this case to allow Tradeloop Members to form their own opinion on the case.

Committee voted to BAN the defendant and BROADCAST the case to the community.

FBI is involved. Non member case. No response.

Case is being closed due to: no follow up by non-member complainant, defendant has disappeared and is already blocked from Tradeloop, multiple complaints 

After reviewing the case, the committee decided to BAN the defendant and POST the case to the community. Note the defendant is not a Tradeloop member, however if they apply they will be denied access.

Voting on this case is now closed. After discussion, the committee voted. The decision was: POST but not BAN. The committee didn't find sufficient reason to ban the defendant, but decided to POST the case blog, so other Tradeloop Members can form their own opinion, based on the original arguments laid out by the complainant and defendant.

Banned for non response

The committee has decided to ban the defendant and post the blog to the Tradeloop Membership.

Committee voted to broadcast the complaint and ban the defendant.

Defendant could not be found on Tradeloop. Fraud Alert sent to community.

Defendant banned from Tradeloop due to not responding to the ethics complaint.

Defendant has been banned for not participating in the ethics process.

Fraudulent 'Tangent Systems' accounts on Tradeloop have been disabled. Case Closed.

Compuvest Corporation of Renton, WA sent a 'fast track fraud alert' to the community about someone posing as a Compuvest employee for the purpose of committing fraud.

Scotland Yard alerted Tradeloop to a fraudulent member selling stolen goods. The account had previously been disabled. The community was alerted.

Ethics committee voted to ban Computek from Tradeloop.

A member made Tradeloop aware of an identity theft, Tradeloop notified the community.

The fraudster was denied access to Tradeloop and the person whose information was used was notified about potential identity theft.

Complaint of identity theft. The account had previously been found and disabled.

Defendant banned from Tradeloop due to non response to complaint.

Originally no action taken due to lack of follow up, but defendant has other posted violations so posting as an FYI.

Ethics Committee took no action. The defendant had already been banned from Tradeloop.

Due to non-response, Triton Communications has been banned from Tradeloop.

Status: The Ethics Committee voted to post the complaint and ban Mingsida from Tradeloop.

Defendant banned from Tradeloop due to failure to respond. NOTE Multiple complaints.

We did not receive a response from HRC. Inc. They cancelled their account on 10/29/05 and since then the phone number has been disconnected and the email account is hard bouncing. The defendant has been banned due to non response. This neither confirms nor denies the facts of the case.

Moved to Posted Violations as an FYI due to other case against defendant.

The Tradeloop Ethics committee voted to BAN the defendant.

Computer Spare Parts (PMITEX) has been banned from Tradeloop for not responding to an ethics complaint.